

The Amazing Spider-Man
"The untold story begins."
Revenue
$758,725,893
Budget
$215,000,000
Where to Watch
Stream in high quality



Global Revenue
$758,725,893
Detailed Plot
Trailer
Production Stills & Gallery






User Reviews
āThe Amazing Spider-Manā has no reason to exist. Spider-man is a hero everyone knows. HeĀ“s been around for so long everyone is familiar with his origin, comic fan or not. Its basic pop culture. Then you have the Sam RaimiĀ“s movies. Everyone saw them. They made loads of money and theyĀ“re always on tv. They are entertaining movies. āSpider-Manā gave us a good origin story in 2002. This movie simply wasn't needed. Now I gave it the benefit of the doubt. ThereĀ“s BurtonĀ“s Batman and NolanĀ“s. Maybe this was a different Spider-Man. A more ādarkā vision perhaps! Maybe the movie spent a few minutes on the origin and then wisely moved on with its story. Maybe... well maybe it wasn't just another rehash. A shameless attempt to remake, or how they say it these days, reboot the same idea with minimal changes except the cast. I was naive. The whole movie is about Spider-ManĀ“s origin. They traded Mary Jane for another love interest and held off on āThe Green Goblinā because that would be too much ārubbing it in the faceā for the fans, I guess. We get Gwen Stacy and āThe Lizardā. The rest is same old, same old. The same uncle Ben plot, the same scenes about making the suit, learning how to control powers, the search for the criminal Spider-man lets get away with horrific results. Same thing. Except everything is done without a spark of energy or creativity. RaimiĀ“s movies were energetic, flowing with excitement. They were ānewā. Seeing Spider-Man on the big screen, webbing all over the city, fighting āThe Green Goblinā, it was amazing. We didn't have āThe Avengersā back there, or āIron Manā. This was like a dream come true for comic fans. āThe Amazing Spider-Manā smells of old cheese. I tried to take the movie for what it was but it was impossible. My mind would not let me. I knew what was going to happen next. I knew all the plots! IĀ“d seen it all before! But even ignoring that the movie just does not work. Its slow, turgid with an unlikable Peter Parker and a CGI lizard for a villain. Parker is a whiny, self centered idiot. His relationship with aunt May and uncle Ben is never fully explored and what little there is consists of Parker being a rude jerk for no reason at all. The movie has one thing going for it. The cast. Sally Field and Martin Sheen are great with what little material they have. Emma Stone is sexy and sweet which is āher thingā and again she pulls it off brilliantly. Rhys Ifans is decent as Curt Connors and surprisingly enough I loved Andrew Garfield as Spidey. Yes, seriously! He looks perfect for the part and he did his best with the horrible script. HeĀ“s charismatic and brought his own touch to the role instead of copying Toby Maguire. If the movie is even slightly original its because of him. Some of the action in the last third of the movie is also spectacular. Spider-manĀ“s movements when fighting are really well done as is the web-slinging. The action is well directed and exciting and the movie sets up a sequel rather nicely. But its asking a lot to go over the material everyone knows for two hours for a few minutes of cool action. The movie plays it so safe it hurts. Its competent but never brilliant. Tedious but far too long with little spots of action but few and far between. I hope in the sequel this āSpider-Manā can find its own style and its own place. Given space to grow and evolve, on the strength of the character and GarfieldĀ“s acting this could be the weak start to a new amazing super-hero trilogy. Then again, maybe iĀ“m just naive.






























